<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trashing the Tate Triennial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artistica.co.uk/2006/02/28/trashing-the-tate-triennial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artistica.co.uk/2006/02/28/trashing-the-tate-triennial/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:52:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: artistica</title>
		<link>http://www.artistica.co.uk/2006/02/28/trashing-the-tate-triennial/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>artistica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artistica.co.uk/2006/02/28/trashing-the-tate-triennial/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should read Waldemar Januszczak&#039;s take on the Triennial in today&#039;s Sunday Times.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2101-2075605,00.html&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should read Waldemar Januszczak&#8217;s take on the Triennial in today&#8217;s Sunday Times.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2101-2075605,00.html">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DARTIST</title>
		<link>http://www.artistica.co.uk/2006/02/28/trashing-the-tate-triennial/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>DARTIST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artistica.co.uk/2006/02/28/trashing-the-tate-triennial/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>I have been to the Triennial and Searle is yesterdays news. He is not from the heart as the previous mail claims - his writing is uncritical and subjective to say the least - he is a well known hater. Damming 36 artists is really stupid. The curatorial theme maybe weak but the art is not all bad... I really liked OTOLITH the film - I thought it was brilliant ... as did I Simon Martins film... Searle should stop being such a powermonger..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been to the Triennial and Searle is yesterdays news. He is not from the heart as the previous mail claims &#8211; his writing is uncritical and subjective to say the least &#8211; he is a well known hater. Damming 36 artists is really stupid. The curatorial theme maybe weak but the art is not all bad&#8230; I really liked OTOLITH the film &#8211; I thought it was brilliant &#8230; as did I Simon Martins film&#8230; Searle should stop being such a powermonger..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Despiser</title>
		<link>http://www.artistica.co.uk/2006/02/28/trashing-the-tate-triennial/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>The Despiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artistica.co.uk/2006/02/28/trashing-the-tate-triennial/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>I am (almost) speechless. I guess you already know that I don&#039;t think very highly of most modern and conceptual art, but there is some stuff that is OK.

This kind of pointless and pretentious drivel is an insult to the few pieces of modern art that DO have value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am (almost) speechless. I guess you already know that I don&#8217;t think very highly of most modern and conceptual art, but there is some stuff that is OK.</p>
<p>This kind of pointless and pretentious drivel is an insult to the few pieces of modern art that DO have value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
